George Russel Weller may not be a name you recognize, but you probably heard his story. 3 years ago, when he was 86, he drove his car through a farmers market in Santa Monica California, killed 10 people and injured many others. His trial which is expected to last 6 weeks is currently underway. If proven guilty of 10 counts of vehicular manslaughter, he will face 18 years in prison.
This is a tragic case on so many levels. A man facing life in prison for something he never wanted to do, and claims he didn't know how to stop. 10 people died, 10 families suffered greatly. What is the right thing to do in this case? Would imprisoning a guilt riden Mr. Weller make the world a safer place? Don't the families of his victims deserve justice?
Upon turning 70 in California, you are required to take a vision test and a written test, but the law does not allow the DMV to force you to automatically take a driving test when you turn 70. If you have a freind or family member you suspect is a danger behind the wheel, you can inform the DMV and they will require a driving test. Many people are living longer than their driving skills are lasting. Giving up driving is giving up freedom, and nobody thinks they'll be the next Mr. Weller, so why should they be the one to stop driving?
The AARP is one of the politically strongest groups in America. They have made it very difficult to pass legislation that discriminates against older drivers. In some ways this is good, right? Discrimination is bad. And,
young drivers are more likely to get into accidents than old drivers, so why pick on them?

We do pick on young drivers. They need a permit, then they can only drive with other adults in the car, no kids. They need to go to a driving school they pay higher insurance. They have the disadvantage of not having as much experience driving, and until that experience makes them better drivers, they are limitted on how and with who they can drive.
As one gets older, they have several disadvantages as drivers. Eye sight gets worse, and reaction time increases, but experience and good driving skills make up for this. But what happens when one gets much older and their bodies can't rely on their skills? Some expect Dr.'s to take care of the problem. Either recommend to the DMV that their patients can't drive, or write them notes saying they can. In my experience with my grandparents, their Dr's will write notes allowing them to drive just to keep their patients happy. If one Dr. won't write a note, they'll just find another who will. Dr.'s job is to heal people, not take away their freedom. I think patients will be bitter and lose respect for their doctor if he/she tells them they can't drive anymore.
I think we need rules that "pick on" the very old drivers that the DMV has concerns about. Not all people of an age group. Just people that can't acheive a certain level on a reflex, hearing and eye sight test. Restricting them from driving on freeways, when it's dark, how far they can go, driving by themselves. I know some of these tactics are already used for isolated cases, but not enough. Even these restrictions probably would not have prevented Mr. Weller from crashing into 10 people. But maybe if he had someone else in the car to tell him his foot was on the gas, not the brake, they would have stopped after crashing into the first car before hitting any pedestrians.
If anybody is going to decide who can drive, and who cannot, it must be the DMV. When a 87 year old man (one of my grandpa's) failed his driving test, he was able to keep his license by complaining enough. The only reason he even had to take a driving test is becuase a family member reported him to the DMV, otherwise he had several more years before they wanted to check his vision again. The man can barely standup.
Mr. Weller told police (sarcastically) that he lucked out the last time he went to the DMV becuase they didn't make him take a driving test. If they did, would those 10 people still be alive? My guess is no, becuase even if he failed the test, the DMV is afraid to piss off senior citizens, and the legislature can't get a bill into law without the support of the AARP.
How many times do 10 people need to die before the DMV changes it's policy about elderly drivers? For me, once is too many.